Katherine Power Net Worth, A Gentleman In Moscow What Happened To Nina, Maricopa County Superior Court Guardianship Forms, Jazzy Power Chair Joystick Controller, Articles W

This is the true constitutional consolidation. Southern states advocated for strong, sovereign state governments, a small federal government, the western expansion of the agricultural economy, and with it, the maintenance of the institution of slavery. . If these opinions be thought doubtful, they are, nevertheless, I trust, neither extraordinary nor disrespectful. The discussion took a wide range, going back to topics that had agitated the country before the Constitution was formed. These irreconcilable views of national supremacy and state sovereignty framed the constitutional struggle that led to Civil War thirty years later. Noah grew a vineyard, got drunk on wine and lay naked. Post-Civil War, as the nation rebuilt and reconciled the balance between federal and state government, federal law became the supreme law of the land, just as Webster desired. . . Consolidation, like the tariff, grates upon his ear. . Hayne argued that the sovereign and independent states had created the Union to promote their particular interests. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you Sir, we will not stop to inquire whether the black man, as some philosophers have contended, is of an inferior race, nor whether his color and condition are the effects of a curse inflicted for the offences of his ancestors. If slavery, as it now exists in this country, be an evil, we of the present day found it ready made to our hands. Foot calling for the temporary suspension of further land surveying until land already on the market was sold (to effectively stop the introduction of new lands onto the market). The Hayne-Webster Debate - Constitution.org . What a commentary on the wisdom, justice, and humanity, of the Southern slave owner is presented by the example of certain benevolent associations and charitable individuals elsewhere. They will not destroy it, they will not impair itthey will only save, they will only preserve, they will only strengthen it! The next day, however, Massachusetts senator Daniel Webster rose with his reply, and the northern states knew they had found their champion. . The debates between daniel webster of massachusetts and robert hayne of south carolina gave. It would be equally fatal to the sovereignty and independence of the states. I spoke, sir, of the ordinance of 1787, which prohibited slavery, in all future times, northwest of the Ohio,[6] as a measure of great wisdom and foresight; and one which had been attended with highly beneficial and permanent consequences. They ordained such a government; they gave it the name of a Constitution, and therein they established a distribution of powers between this, their general government, and their several state governments. I now proceed to show that it is perfectly safe, and will practically have no effect but to keep the federal government within the limits of the Constitution, and prevent those unwarrantable assumptions of power, which cannot fail to impair the rights of the states, and finally destroy the Union itself.