Chamberlain College Of Nursing Honor Roll Gpa, Articles R

All rights reserved. Section 1. and its Licensors http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/377/533.html, Wesberry v. Sanders. Oyez. Reynolds v. Sims was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1964. 100% remote. I would definitely recommend Study.com to my colleagues. After specifying a temporary reapportionment plan, the district court stated that the 1962 election of state legislators could only be conducted according to its plan. Several individuals across 30 states who have being harmed by redistricting and legislative apportionment schemes brought suit in federal courts. Justice Potter Stewart also issued a concurring opinion, in which he argued that while many of the schemes of representation before the court in the case were egregiously undemocratic and clearly violative of equal protection, it was not for the Court to provide any guideline beyond general reasonableness for apportionment of districts. Post-Reynolds, a number of states had to change their apportionment plans to take population into account. Today's holding is that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires every State to structure its legislature so that all the members of each house represent substantially the same number of people; other factors may be given play only to the extent that they do not significantly encroach on this basic 'population' principle. ThoughtCo, Aug. 28, 2020, thoughtco.com/reynolds-v-sims-4777764. The plaintiffs requested a declaration that "establishing the present apportionment of seats in the Alabama Legislature, were unconstitutional under the Alabama and Federal Constitutions, and an injunction against the holding of future elections for legislators until the legislature reapportioned itself in accordance with the State Constitution. Sims: Summary, Decision & Significance. If the 14th Amendment rights of Alabama residents were being violated due to the unequally proportioned representatives in different legislative districts in Alabama. Sims?ANSWERA.) The political question doctrine states that, when it is invoked, that a case is unable to be settled in the court of law if the issue it addresses stems from an essence that is merely political in its nature. Click here to contact our editorial staff, and click here to report an error. Reynolds v. Sims Summary & Significance - study.com are hardly of any less significance for the present and the future. David J. VANN and Robert S. Vance, Appellants, v. Agnes BAGGETT, Secretary of State of Alabama et al. It concluded by saying both houses of Alabamas bicameral legislature be apportioned on a population basis. Further stating that the equal protection clause wasnot designed for representatives whom represent all citizens to be greater or less. (2020, August 28). Baker v. Reynolds v. Sims | law case | Britannica However, states should strive to create districts that offer representation equal to their population. Therefore, requiring both houses of a State bicameral legislature to apportion on a population basis is appropriate under the Equal Protection Clause.